In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of each of the facts charged of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the permissible scope of amendments to indictment, the establishment of joint principal offenders, and the referral of a violation of the Act by an attorney-at-law, or by misapprehending the facts in violation of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.