However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM5 car.

On August 15, 2014, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at a speed of 0.264% with alcohol concentration around 22:00 and proceeded at a speed of about 50 K km from the side of the department store to the front side of the Dental located in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by reducing speed and operating the steering system of the vehicle accurately, by checking well the steering system of the vehicle, and by safely operating the steering system of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and the part of the lower part of the Furstle car of the victim E(the age of 31) driving in the signal atmosphere was received as the front part of the above SM5 car.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim G G (M5) on board the said SM5 car to receive approximately two-day medical treatment; (b) knee kne se se se see se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and H;

1. G statements;

1. Traffic accident report and accident report of an employer-employed driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each written diagnosis and written estimate for automobile repair;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime at issue;

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.