beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.27 2017고정2590

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an owner of “E” and Defendant B and C is an employee of the said agency.

Defendants: (a) around 17:00 on May 24, 2017, around 17:0, on the roads near the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “E”; (b) JMW car owned by Defendant A, which is a staff member of the Gu Office of Jongno-gu; (c) Defendant C’s JM car owned by Defendant C; (d) Defendant C’s low-speed L 7 car owned by Defendant C; (c) Defendant C intended to impose a fine for negligence; (d) Defendant C took a bath, h’s arms at hand; and (e) h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h;

The Defendants conspired as above and interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the crackdown on illegal spirits by official officials of the Gu office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness I and H;

1. Reproduction of CCTV images installed in E;

1. Application of the CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes to duplicate video images recorded on a cell phone submitted by the victim I;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose punishment: Fine.

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act