beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.11.26 2015고단1060

특수협박등

Text

Defendant

A and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000, and Defendant C by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant C and Defendant C violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) on January 19, 2015, within the E main point located in the East Sea, around 20:40 on January 19, 2015, reported the victim F (Isia and 43 years old) to enter the said main point, and caused the victim to sit on the side of his/her own body. However, the victim refused it and entered the main room. However, Defendant C opened a visit to which the victim was following, and Defendant C got the victim into the victim’s left arms and Defendant B, respectively.

Therefore, on the ground that the victim told H, who is an employee of the above main place, the victim, "supreh and go late to calculate the drinking value", the defendants again saw the victim's body body, hair, breast, leg part, etc.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as the dives impairment of head dives that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Around January 19, 2015, Defendant A’s assaulted Defendant A’s Defendant at around 20:45, the victim F was unable to enter the entrance from the entrance on the side of the entrance, and assaulted the victim’s neck behind the victim.

3. On January 19, 2015, Defendant B and Defendant A expressed the attitude that Defendant B, at around 20:55 on January 19, 2015, upon receiving a report of assault at the above main station, she left the chest from the victim F in front of the police officer called the victim F, and she would have been able to keep the victim out of the bar, and her head, a beer, which is a dangerous object that was left behind the floor due to a knife, she was her head, and her attitude was expressed that Defendant A would have been her provokinged to the victim by taking two beer diseases, which are dangerous objects by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly threatened the victim with dangerous articles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to diagnostic certificates and photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;