except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant was an insurance solicitor, and the wife of the victim C became aware of the victim's insurance through the defendant around 1998.

1. On May 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) called the victim C at an infinite place Seoul (Seoul) or called the victim C to meet the Defendant’s claim for damages before leaving KRW 20 million.

2. The Defendant, at around May 10, 201, borrowed KRW 20 million from the Defendant’s office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and received KRW 1,00,00,00 from the Defendant to the Defendant for the purpose of paying 50,00 won or more as interest every month. However, at around that time, the Defendant had to pay 1,00,00 won or more as interest every month from other creditors, loan companies, etc. while the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the interest or principal even if he borrowed money from the victim, such as not being given a certain amount of revenue. The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2,00,00 from the victim for the purpose of borrowing KRW 5,00 from the Defendant’s office in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and received KRW 10,000 from the victim for the purpose of borrowing KRW 1,50,000,000,00,000 from the Defendant.