However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendants are those who operated G-based 120,121 from December 2, 2013 to June 2015 in Busan Dong-gu F shopping district from around December 2013 to June 2015, and Defendant A is the mother of Defendant B.

The Defendants, while operating G-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S

From November 2014 to April 2015, the Defendants presented a sales slips between six months in which the Defendants sold sales revenue as above to the victim He/she transferred it to the victim He/she around May 2015, and conducted as if the sales revenue recorded in a device was an actual sales revenue. The Defendants determined that the sales revenue recorded in the device was KRW 70 million for the victim who believed it to be true and the G abortion, and received KRW 70 million in total, including KRW 10 million around May 21, 2015, and KRW 60 million around June 5, 2015. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26374, May 21, 2015; Presidential Decree No. 26357, Jun. 5, 2015>

As a result, the Defendants conspired, by deceiving the victim as above, and obtained 70 million won from the victim to receive 70 million won as premium.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with H (including the substitute part);

1. Each written statement prepared by the I;

1. The application of the business registration certificate, the current status of sales by date, the passbook receipt of a national bank-free passbook, G franchise agreement, a video CD, a screen photograph, an investigation report (on-site investigation), an investigation report, a CD, a CD, an investigation report (victim’s telephone investigation), a criminal investigation report (the victim’s telephone investigation), a detailed statement by receipt (the statement by the head of the G head office), the current status of sales by receipt, CCTV images, and the provisions of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images in order

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution (the following sentencing shall be considered in light of the favorable circumstances in mind):

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order, was committed in a planned manner against the injured party.