When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 14, 2014, at around 22:04, the Defendant driven a d bargaining vehicle at a distance of about 500 meters from the front side of the Yancheon-Eup apartment to the front side of the same Eup, in the state of 0.131% alcohol level.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a drinking driver, a report on the circumstance of a drinking driver, a report on the results of the control of drinking driving, a notice of the completion of correction, a written consent to blood collection, a report on blood collection of a drinking driver, a report on the circumstances of drinking driving, a report on the request for appraisal, a report on detection of a drinking driver, an investigation report, a report on driver's license, a vehicle register, an

1. Article 148-2(2)2 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148-2(2)2 and 44(1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts and the Defendant’s defense counsel shall report to the police in relation to the assault case, and the police did not drive a vehicle with injury prior to the misunderstanding. However, the following circumstances can be comprehensively acknowledged by this court after considering each evidence duly adopted and examined. ① E, which was the Defendant and the Defendant’s defense counsel, was snick at the time when the Defendant arrived at the C office, and stated that he did not drink after the arrival at the said office. ② The Defendant reported to the Y box in the police investigation process, and reported to the police station for about 20 minutes after the arrival of the police station, and the Defendant made a statement to the effect that he was unable to take advantage of the police officer’s remaining after the booming of the vehicle at the time of his arrival.