When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On September 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 20:40 on September 7, 2016, the Defendant, within the “E” operated by the Sinsan-si C Victim D (M, 40 Do) of the Victim D (E) in U.S. C, for the reason that the drinking value of Marinas 3 C C C was 4.80,000 won for each of the two weeks in the two weeks in the two weeks in U.S., the Defendant: (b) stated that the Defendant would die; (c) stated that the Defendant would die the victim; (d) stated that the Defendant would die the victim; and (d) stated that the victim’s shouldered the victim’s shoulder.

2. On September 23, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main management work by force, such as drinking alcohol in a state where the victim did not make a report and agreement to the police authority as seen above, and drinking alcohol in front of E, and opening the entrance door at the same place, and going against the customer’s inner part of the hole, making the customer go back, and making the customer go back, and making the customer go up at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTVs;

1. Article 260 (1) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 314 (1) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the selection of each fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.