1. The Defendant: (a) from March 2016 to March 22, 2016, the Defendant was aware of at the victim C and the Internet Edridton club; (b) from members of the club including the victim, a self-denunciation business with a monthly revenue of KRW 30 million has been carried out; (c) has over the ability to resume; and (d) around August 22, 2016 to the victim at the same club near the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Drown-dong Drdong, the Defendant’s revenue from the table per three million won for each store to operate four main points.

If investment of KRW 20 million is made, it will be paid from KRW 1 million per month to KRW 1,500,000 per month as profits.

“.....”

However, in fact, the defendant did not operate the main points and was scheduled to use the money received from the injured person as the name of repayment of personal debts, so there was no intention or ability to return the agreed profits even if he received the money from the injured person.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he acquired 20 million won from the victim to the corporate bank account under the name of the defendant on the same day.

2. On September 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the drinking place near the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council of the same club in Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu; and (b) on September 2016, the Defendant’s monthly revenue amounting to KRW 30 billion because of the number of days in the inner house to KRW 1 billion.

20 million won can be loaned to the Gu funeral business operator for about 100 days, and 300,000 won can be paid as profit, which is 20 million won investment.

Along with all documents related to the number of days, the lawyer did not have to receive it, and the lawyer stated that the lawyer is "d to include money."

However, in fact, the number of days of the principal is approximately KRW 100 million, and there was no surplus funds used in the cost of living, and there was no intention or ability to return agreed profits even if the defendant received the money from the injured party as a result of the plan to use the money as the cost of living.

Defendant 2: (a) The Defendant deceivings the victim as above; and (b) around September 5, 2016, from the victim to the victim.