However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a real operator of C, and D is a business director of a personal company with the trade name “E,” and D is a person who installed electronic equipment and conducts business in the manner of receiving the price for the goods from the victim company for a person who entered into a contract with the victim F, Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”).

While the Defendant, while operating the Defendant Company C, he was aware of D with the introduction of S, which was while he was about due to the lack of construction cost, due to the lack of construction cost, and D received the purchase price of goods to be supplied after the rental contract from D in advance and used them in another place, and the delivery of goods is a method of financing money by purchasing goods by extending several months.

“A” shall hear horses and to D “a money is necessary.”

"The intention of 200 million won is different from that of 30 million won in financing," and D accepted this.

On April 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) concluded a contract between the victim company and the Defendant, a representative of C in the name of C, to lease electronic equipment and facilities equivalent to KRW 240,000,000,000, which are to be installed at the G-based ground lending, and to pay KRW 10,000,000 per month to the victim company for 24 months.

However, the defendant and D did not use it for the purchase of goods, but it was thought that they would be used for the construction cost of the loan and the purchase price of the land located in the Young-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

Accordingly, on April 14, 2015, the victim company remitted KRW 240 million to the bank account under the name of the representative JJ of the "E" to the bank account in the name of the E's representative goods price.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, by deceiving the victim company, received 240 million won from the victim company by receiving the payment from the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the second public trial records;

1.With respect to D, I