2. In full view of the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times for violent crimes, committed again during the same repeated crime period, and did not agree with the victim, the lower court’s sentencing appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various grounds for sentencing asserted by the Defendant, and there is no special circumstance to change ex post facto sentencing. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.