The judgment below

In light of the records, it is reasonable for the court below to maintain the judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the victim C and D on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the violation of the Road Traffic Act (not after-accident) against the victim C and D among the facts charged in this case. There is no violation of the law of logic and experience and the principle of free evaluation of evidence, nor violation of the legal principles concerning the violation of the Road Traffic Act (not after-accident) or violation of the principle

On the other hand, although the prosecutor submitted a written appeal to the effect that he/she is dissatisfied with the guilty portion of the judgment below, he/she did not state the grounds of appeal as to that portion in the appellate brief, and thus this part

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.