However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 18, 2018, at around 02:25, the Defendant damaged public goods, in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, a taxi engineer under the influence of alcohol and a trial driver, and the Seoul, who was called upon 112, was urged to return home from a slopeD belonging to the 112 district unit in the Pyeongtaek Police Station, and the Defendant was able to walk back a pan-way in front of the left 11 vehicle of the C District 11 on the left side of the C District 11 on the left side, and damaged the repair cost, such as Larter, plur, plar, g52.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

2. Around September 18, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, and around 02:39, the Seoul, located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, was transferred to the said district zone for the reason of paragraph 1, and subsequently refused to sit the said D’s bucks, bucks, and bucks, and bucks, which caused the Defendant’s assault on eight occasions, when refusing to sit in the atmosphere.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning the current custody of criminals.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. One copy of a report of investigation (a net 11 video analysis) (a copy of a screen), a caps;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes 1 to a report on investigation (Submission of a written estimate for repair within the C District), and a written estimate for general repair costs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (a) (a point of damage to goods for public use), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. A crime for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of a recommendation / [the scope of a recommendation / The scope of a recommendation / The scope of a recommendation / The scope of a recommendation / The scope of a punishment shall interfere with the execution of a public service] of the basic area (the scope of a recommendation / the scope of a recommendation / the execution of a public service from June to June) of Article 1 (the scope of a recommendation / the execution of a public service) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution: The unfavorable circumstances from June to two years (the decision of a sentence / the execution of a public service): the public goods shall