However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 3, 2016, the Defendant shall file an application with C community service center located in B, Si Mapopo City on August 3, 2016, under consultation with D of the working staff belonging to Si Mapo-si, for basic living recipients at C community service center located in B, and the Defendant shall file an application with D of the above D.

“I am d't we see why she would d't fl't fl't fl't fl't fl't b

"............. the small portion of the picture on one's book was sent to the above D once, and assaulted against the above D by complying with the left part of the above D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of public officials' duties in social welfare affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (Confirmation ofCCTV video data);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant has recognized the crime of this case by an investigative agency and that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime);