If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. The Defendant: (a) around 01:20 on August 17, 2012, caused damage to property: (b) on the “D key points” in the “D key points for the operation of the Victim C (Y, 42 years old); and (c) on the ground that he did not have the connection, the Defendant: (a) caused damage to the passenger’s cryp and the passenger’s cryp in the city, following the Defendant’s cryp to the display stand, and caused damage to the passenger’s cryp and the passenger’s cryp in the city.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim by walking the buckbucks, upon the victim’s escape from the time and place set forth in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Articles 366 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of each fine;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. A provisional payment order: A sentence shall be imposed as ordered by considering all the following circumstances as a result of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, taking into account the following circumstances: The unfavorable circumstances that the amount of damage to property appears to be minor: In light of the circumstances leading to the crime and the circumstances after the crime (i.e., page 23 of investigation records), the crime is inferior; there are many criminal records of the same kind including a suspended sentence, and other criminal records of the same kind, including a suspended sentence