When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is engaged in driving a small-scale taxi driver.

On October 22, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of about 50 kilometers per hour between the two-lanes in the direction of the national bank located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, the Defendant continued to drive the vehicle at a speed of about 50 kilometers per hour between the two-lanes.

The location is that there is a crosswalk such as on-and-off signal.

In such cases, when a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle reduces the speed, well sees the front left well, and pedestrians walk the crosswalk, he/she has a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk to check the safety of pedestrians first and to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and continues to proceed at the same speed.

The victim D (the age of 38, remaining) who crosses the crosswalk, which is on-and-off signal, to the right side from the left side, is found late, and the victim was placed on the right side of the defendant's vehicle.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim due to negligence in the course of business, such as internal side rupture, which requires treatment for about six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Descriptions of a medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on images of on-site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the instant traffic accident for the instant order of provisional payment, where the victim suffered injury for about six weeks, the Defendant had been punished twice for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant agreed to pay two million won to the victim in criminal conciliation proceedings. In addition, the Defendant paid two million won to the victim.