A. The Defendant, at the time of the examination of the identification card, only presents a false student identification card made by mobile phone display, and there is no fact that he/she presented a photograph of another person’s resident registration certificate.

B. The sentence (one million won of fine) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The Defendant also argued the same argument in the lower court. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court presented the following facts: ① the Defendant and B (the Defendant and the Defendant did not make any accounting after drinking and drinking at the main point at the time of the first instance trial; ② the Defendant reported 112, which is the primary address; ② the Defendant and B made a statement to the effect that they confirmed their identity as 97 years and 98 years old on the same day; ③ the Defendant and the Defendant and the Defendant stated that they provided alcohol and drinking alcohol without examining their identification cards at the main point on September 22, 2019; ④ the Defendant and the Defendant and the Defendant stated that they provided their personal identification cards at the time of the instant crime: (i) the Defendant and the Defendant entered the police station under suspicion of violating the Juvenile Protection Act; and (ii) the Defendant directly inspected their identification cards at the police station on October 7, 201; and (iii) the Defendant and the police officer stated their personal identification certificates at the time of the instant case 2G.