However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name “C” in Busan Jin-gu B.

Around 22:00 on February 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 170,000 as a price for sexual traffic; (b) assisted a police officer who pretended to be customers to engage in sexual traffic D and sexual traffic in the fourth room in the said establishment; (c) received KRW 170,000 from the police officer around April 21, 2015; and (d) assisted the said fourth room to engage in sexual traffic D and sexual traffic; and (e) assisted the said police officer to receive KRW 170,00 from the police officer around April 23:10, 2015; and (e) assisted the said employee E to receive KRW 170,00 from the enforcement officer on May 7, 2015 and arrange the said employee E to engage in sexual traffic and arrange to engage in sexual traffic, from February 15, 2015 to May 27, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of G, E, and H;

1. Each statement of H and F;

1. A letter of each of D;

1. Notification of detection of any business place in violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, a report on control of each business place, a copy of the report on control of the business place, a report on detection of each business place;

1. Report on investigation (control photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the first offense, the degree of which is against one another, etc.);