2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving construction machinery C.

On September 11:25, 2014, the Defendant driven a vehicle for the possession of the vehicle, which was located in D at both weeks, and led to the release of the vehicle in front of the E plant located in D.

At the same time, the victim F parked Gick and was engaged in the sales of the factory roof, so the construction machinery driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving construction machinery in a safe way without entering the cler's meeting.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went into the front half of the lelele and destroyed the said lele in a manner that is equivalent to approximately KRW 5.6 million, such as the replacement and repair of the external cases of the main body of the lelelele, by shocking the lower part of the upper part of the lelelele in the field of business negligence bypassing the right.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court (the second trial date);

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (influence of accident image heads);

1. Relevant Articles 151 (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;