beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.10.10 2014고단1178

사서명위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 20, 2014, the Defendant driven the Medibane car at a 1km section from the front of the small amam apartment, which is located in the Sinpo City calculation 0.122% of the blood alcohol concentration without a driver’s license, to the front of the natural history museum located in the Sinpo-si Southern City, while under the influence of alcohol by around 21:45 on July 20, 2014.

2. On July 20, 2014, around 21:45, the Defendant: (a) discovered a drunk driving and unlicensed driving on the front of the Natural History Museum located in his/her Southern-si; and (b) forged the signature of D’s signature, stating “D” to the police without authority, for the purpose of exercising the right to sign on the digital signature column from C in the process of traffic control in the Mapo Police Station to the police station in charge of traffic control in the Supo Police Station.

3. The Defendant, like Paragraph 2, submitted a forged D’s signature to C, who was aware of the forgery, and exercised the signature.

4. When the Defendant, at the same time and place as stated in paragraph (2), discovered a private document forgery as above, he stolen D’s personal information without authority for the purpose of uttering, and caused C to enter D’ and D’s resident registration number in the name column of the report on the statement of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the driver, and forged the report on the state of the state of the driver’s identity, which is the private document on the back of the phrase “I will confirm that the above contents were the same as the facts, recognize the results of measurement, and sign the Defendant notified that blood would be collected if unfair, then I will sign the Defendant’s personal information.”

5. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, is forged as if he had duly formed the report on the actual state of his driver, who forged the report, as provided in Paragraph 4.

참조조문