2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

A. The Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) is a company that from October 16, 2002 to the seat of the main office of Gwangju City as the Plaintiff A, and the Plaintiff B is a representative director of Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

After establishing a branch, A, from July 25, 2002 to July 25, 2006, from Songpa-gu Seoul (hereinafter referred to as "AD branch"), AB (hereinafter referred to as "AB branch") was the seat of the branch, and Gangnam-gu Seoul (hereinafter referred to as "AB branch") was the seat of the branch from July 25, 2006.

B. The first tax investigation and the first accusation 1) The chief of Echeon Tax Office refers to a person who is engaged in the business of issuing a tax invoice without supplying goods or services on data from February 2006 to a person who is engaged in the business of issuing a processed tax invoice without a real transaction, i.e., a person who is engaged in the business of issuing a processed tax invoice without a real transaction. On suspicion, an investigation into Plaintiff A (hereinafter “the first tax

A) Around July 1, 2006, the Plaintiffs published 18 companies’ personal data system corporations (hereinafter “personal data system”), including Vietnamese Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Swelves”) from July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005 (hereinafter “Swelves”), F, G, H, I, and I, Aditer International Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Aditer”), J, K, K, L, M, B, I, Balves Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Aditer”), N, V, P, Q, R, and S for the same period of time 1,36,431,00 won and 45 personal data: hereinafter “Irves Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Ir: hereinafter “Irves”) for supply without real transactions; and hereinafter “Irves Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Irves”) for the same period of time.

from supply value to 1,540,648,00 won is false.