2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

A. Although each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) is unregistered land, since the resident registration number of the network B, who is the father of each plaintiff, is written on the land cadastre, this does not fall under the time when the registrant is absent or the registrant cannot be identified solely with the entries in the register, and once the competent cadastral authority files an application for correction of the registered matters under Article 84(1) of the Act on the Establishment, Management, etc. of Spatial Data against the competent cadastral authority, and if the competent cadastral authority refuses to file a lawsuit against the defendant without following the procedure, the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed as there is no benefit of confirmation.

B. Determination 1) The claim for confirmation of land ownership against the State is an unregistered land and there is no registered titleholder on the land cadastre or forest land cadastre, or the identity of the registered titleholder is unknown, and there is a benefit of confirmation only when there are special circumstances, such as the State continuously denying the ownership by a third party who is a registered titleholder (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 93Da58738, Dec. 2, 1994). In addition, registration of ownership preservation can be applied by a certified copy of land cadastre or forest land cadastre (Article 130 subparag. 1 of the Registration of Real Estate Act), a person who proves his/her ownership by a judgment (Article 130 subparag. 2 of the Registration of Real Estate Act), a person who acquired the ownership by expropriation (Article 130 subparag. 3 of the same Act).