시효연장을위한확인
1. The decision on the construction cost case between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is based on the Daegu District Court Decision 2010 Ghana1135.
1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;
2. Judgment with no ground for recognition (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act);
3. A lawsuit concerning an additional right to property subject to jurisdiction may be brought to the court having the jurisdiction over the place of residence or the place of obligation performance (Article 8 of the Civil Procedure Act); and the institution of a subsequent suit for interrupting prescription falls in essence an act of managing and preserving claims, and an obligee may, at his/her own option, bring a subsequent suit for interrupting prescription in the form of a confirmation suit,
(2) The Majority Opinion states that, in cases where an obligee files a confirmation suit as a subsequent suit for the interruption of extinctive prescription, it shall be deemed that not only constitutes a property right lawsuit, but also the filing of a performance suit for the interruption of extinctive prescription with respect to a monetary claim established by judgment in a prior suit, it is reasonable to interpret that such lawsuit may be filed with the court having jurisdiction over the place of performance of obligations.
Therefore, this court does not transfer this case to the court having jurisdiction over the location of the defendant's general forum, and decides as per Disposition.