The Defendant is a person engaging in driving Q 25 tons TGX trucks.

On July 30, 2013, the Defendant driven the above truck, and changed the lane to four lanes at a speed of about 128 km from the 104.7 km away from the 1,04 km away from the 1,000 km away from the 1,000 km away from the 1,000 km away from the 1,000 km away from the 1,000 km away from the west-gun.

At the time of loading weight of more than 1.5 tons, 80 km per hour, which is the speed limit for trucks, there was a duty of care to observe the speed limit for persons engaged in driving motor vehicles, and to make changes in the lanes by operating direction direction, etc., giving notice of change of course, and considering the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and changed the lane as it is without neglecting it, and caused the damage to the left-hand side of the victim R(the age of 49) driving, which was proceeding four-lanes on the same side, to take the front left-hand side of the above truck, to the right-hand side part of the above truck, and led the above camera truck to turn back to the left-hand side by the shocking of the road, and shocking the road dricks and dricks.

As a result, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence by breaking the body of the above body of the instant body of the truck, resulting in the death of the victim due to the cage of cage cages and the dives damage from the two parts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Notification of results with regard to traffic accident engineering and request for analysis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning autopsys;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;