2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include the fact that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime, and that part of the damage was recovered to the victim D in 2008.

However, the crime of this case has the same power twice for the defendant, and the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the money from the victims by forging a private document in a planned manner, and the nature of the crime is extremely poor, the victim G was not repaid even though the amount of damage to the victim was considerable, and it seems that the defendant caused damage to F by forging a letter of borrowed money in the name of F, and the defendant had caused damage to F to the unnecessary invoice. The court below has already been sentenced in full consideration of the above circumstances, and there was no change of circumstances that can be different from the judgment of the court below, and there was no change of circumstances that may be different from the punishment of the court below. In full view of all other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, relationship with victims, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, the punishment of the court below is judged to be adequate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.