If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 04:00 on May 2, 2013, the Defendant tried to see “D” in front of the main point of “D operated by the victim C, which is located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.” On the ground that the victim, who was making a body in front of the main point, went to the phrase “dop,” and hereinafter “dop Y,” the Defendant destroyed the above entrance doors managed by the victim by putting the door door open to the front place of the said main point in order to have the victim repair the door door up to 300,000 won, on the ground that the victim entered the door without the care.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of damage;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.