1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court’s determination that the instant facts charged were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules

2. Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below in relation to the request for attachment order, in light of the court below’s order to attach an electronic tracking device for 10 years on the ground as stated in its reasoning, it is just for the court below to have determined that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a sexual crime and again committed a sexual crime within 10 years after the execution of the sentence was completed, and that the sexual crime was committed twice or more, and that the recidivism was likely to have been committed, and that there

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.