beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.07.26 2017고단4200

변호사법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for up to eight months.

However, with respect to Defendant A and B, it shall be between two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A received on December 2, 2012 from F to F in the “E” coffee shop located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, for the first time, a request was made by F to read “G hospital’s Y and doctor H are the friendships in the G hospital, and the head of the G hospital is newly appointed, but the head of the G hospital is different from the help to appoint H as the head of the G hospital.”

Accordingly, through Defendant B and Defendant C, Defendant C, who is his branch, requested that H be appointed to the president of the G hospital, and Defendant B and Defendant C consented thereto, and the Defendants and A conspired to receive money and valuables from F under the pretext of the street with respect to the I president.

According to the above public offering, Defendant A and Defendant B arranged F to F at a restaurant located in the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J around December 2012, 2012, “C is friendly with I chief director and C, so C can see the rest of the chief director and H through C, and expenses need to be borne.

On January 2, 2013, Defendant A received KRW 50 million from F to the K’s account under its management, Defendant B transferred KRW 30 million from A to the L’s management on the same day, and Defendant C received KRW 15 million from Defendant B at the coffee shop located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City M hotel on the 3rd day of the same month.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to deliver KRW 50 million to A for the purpose of arranging or soliciting cases or affairs handled by a person who is deemed a public official, and Defendant B received KRW 30 million among them through Defendant A, and Defendant C received KRW 15 million through Defendant A and Defendant B.

Summary of Evidence

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant A and B;

1. The defendant C's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, L, H and N;

1. Each legal statement of the witness A and B (defendant C)

1. Details of each account transaction, application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I articles of incorporation;

1. Defendants of the relevant law on criminal facts: Article 111 (1) of the Act

1. Punishment;