For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the Defendant of violating the Act on the Obstruction of Duties and Punishment of Violences, Etc. (hereinafter “Assault Punishment Act”) among the charges charged against the Defendant.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the duties to be protected in the crime of interference with business, and the establishment of crimes of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.