2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the crime of this case was committed six times more than 1,290,00 won by the defendant theft, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the defendant in light of the circumstance, method, frequency, etc. of the crime; and (b) the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was under suspension of execution after being sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same crime; (c) although the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and made a statement that his mistake is divided, the damage amount of each crime of this case is relatively minor; (d) the victim did not want the punishment against the defendant; (e) the defendant did not have any record of criminal punishment exceeding 1,290,00 won; (e) the defendant's family members want to take the preference against the defendant; (e) the defendant's age, character and conduct, the motive and environment of the crime of this case; and (e) the defendant's motive, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case; (e.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.