2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

1. Defendant A:

가. 2014. 12. 25. 19:17 인터 넷 포털 사이트 다음의 “C” 라는 카페에 접속하여, 자유 게시판에 “C 이 뽑은 2014년 D 교회 최악의 인물상” 이라는 게시물에 “E” 라는 닉네임으로 “ 미친 파렴치한!!!” 이라는 댓 글을 작성 게시하고,

(b) access to the Kafeng on March 5, 2015 to the Kafeng, “Boogles written in Bafe,” and “Bogles written in Bafeng”

C. The message “E” written and posted the comments “E” on “E”, thereby openly insulting the victim F, respectively.

2. Defendant B:

A. On March 1, 2015, access to the 01:15 Franc, “G” in the notice “Francing letter” is the clinic of “G”, and “human garbage F and H are the same as the flacing letter, even if they assault and assault.”

“Preparation and posting comments on comments”;

B. Accessing to the above car page on March 1, 2015, 07:04, the phrase “fabbb number f.b.b. D church f.b. head of the D church f.b. head,” is clearly indicated.

“G” as the clinic of “G” on the bulletin “W,” the main crime of human horse F and H assault, one of which people crypates, must be discarded.

“Preparation and posting comments on comments”;

C. On March 22, 2015, access to 20:32 the Kaf, and “I cannot see that the D church F wooden spackers’ wres are at the time of signing an assault.”

The term “G” in the notice “I” is the clinic of “G”, and the victim of the assault against the so-called Bassa of this group unable to relieve.”

“Preparation and publication of comments on “”, thereby openly insulting the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by each of the defendants in court;

1. Application of each text of statutes on comments;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning a crime. Article 311 (Selection of Penalty)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;