If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around July 22, 2012, the Defendant returned home with the Defendant, who was on duty at the front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul. However, the Defendant obstructed the taxi business by blocking the taxi and walking the taxi on the ground that the taxi engineer refused boarding. As a result, the Defendant obstructed the taxi business by blocking the taxi and walking the taxi on the ground that the taxi engineer refused boarding. Accordingly, the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the D District Party called to the site after receiving 112 reports, attempted to arrest the Flagrant on the charge of interfering with the business of the above C, and the above C tried to take a patrol at the scene, such as interfering with the business of the above B, and walked twice the above E’s buckbuck site and walk up the bridge, and the Defendant participated in it, and caused the assault, such as quihing the quibbbbbbbbbbing with the face of the above E, spheringinginging it, and baling it.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the above C and interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement of the F, E, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.