2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. From February 16, 2011, the Plaintiff participated in the public labor business (regional community employment business) implemented in Busan-si B and worked until June of the same year.

B. On January 16, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a wound of “damage to the ground and power lines of the shoulder shoulder belt,” and on February 17, 2011, by the C Hospital’s diagnosis (hereinafter “instant wound”). On February 16, 2011, the Plaintiff was working for the Defendant on February 16, 201, while shouldering the ice with the left shoulder (hereinafter “instant disaster”).

) On the ground that the hospital was treated with medical treatment and was diagnosed as the instant injury and disease, the hospital filed an application for medical care benefits for the instant injury and disease.

C. On February 20, 2014, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiff a disposition not to grant medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant injury and disease cannot be recognized as a proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s work due to a sedentary disease.

The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for an examination to the Defendant, but received a decision of dismissal on May 12, 2014, and filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but received a decision of dismissal again on October 16, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 5, 8, 10, 13 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had a strong shocked against the erobbbrance of erogrosis in order to shoulder the ice at the time of the instant accident, which caused the instant injury to the Defendant.

Even if there was a king evidence against the Plaintiff, the symptoms rapidly aggravated due to the disaster of this case more than the natural progress speed.

Therefore, there is a proximate causal relation between the disaster of this case and the injury and the injury and disease of this case, and the prior disposition of this case is unlawful on a different premise.

(b) The entry of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes are as follows;