If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant was a person who operated C in Echeon-si from March 1, 2019 to April 14, 2019.

Any person who intends to engage in business of making profits or losses on property by collecting property or property from many persons and determining such profits or losses by an incidental method shall be equipped with facilities and obtain permission from the Commissioner of the Local Police Agency.

Nevertheless, on March 1, 2019, the Defendant, without permission, put a water exhauster of 19 meters in width and 38 meters in width and at least 1,000 m38 meters, attached the number tag in which “rice and rice meal meal” was indicated in 40 mar, and carried out a speculative business by raising sales of 150,000 won per day to customers who choose the number tag in 32,500 won for rice and the number tag in which “rice” was written in 32,500 won for customers who were selected from the above “C”, and 32,000 won for food meal service, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing number plates, number plates, veterinary photographs, give-out photographs, and give-out photographs;

1. Article 30 (2) 1 and Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Specific Crimes concerning Relevant Acts and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the key issue of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The Defendant’s assertion of the defense counsel did not engage in any speculative act, but only performed business activities to attract customers.

2. Article 2(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. defines speculative acts as “an act of collecting goods or property benefits from many persons and determining gains or losses through an influence method and causing financial gains or losses.”

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant is the number list.