beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.01.14 2014구단285

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From April 4, 2013 to June 19, 2007, the Plaintiff registered his/her business as “D” in the name of “A” under his/her own son’s own son’s name, and registered Kwikset Service Company (hereinafter “E”) with Kwikset Service Officer and performed delivery duties. At around 11:00 on April 13, 2013, the Plaintiff delivered the key to the plane high-nuclear power headquarters located in the head of the Si/Gun/Eup/Myeon in Busan, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of the traffic accident (hereinafter “instant accident”), which falls short of 1:0 on the so-called “an accident, e.g., acute e., acute e., bovine spongiformiformiform, e., bovine spongiformiformiform, e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., the instant accident”).

B. As to this, the Defendant agreed that, although the Plaintiff is Kwikset service engineer belonging to E, only the Plaintiff’s delivery business is not limited to the Plaintiff’s delivery business, and that E’s delivery business is conducted preferentially.

The company selected and delivered a call according to the self-regulation of articles other than the method determined by the affiliated company, such as a set-off or set-off, and settled profits in the way of fixed rate, and notified the decision not to approve the plaintiff's application for medical care (hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case") on the ground that it mainly does not constitute a person in a special type of employment who is requested from one Kwikset Service company to engage in delivery duties.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 6, 7, Eul evidence 1, 2, 3, 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the instant disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion.