except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 20, 2012, the Defendant was driving a B B Poter freight vehicle at around 08:30 on September 20, 2012, and was driving in front of the entrance of the Yongsan Village located in the Yongsan-dong in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant was driving the central line at the seat of the Dong-gu, Gwangju, by negligence in the course of business, and by negligence, the injured party C(52 years old, female) driving who proceeded at the opposite lane. The Defendant continued to drive the FSM3 driver in front of the victim E(32 years old, female) driving, who continued to proceed thereafter, and continued to drive the FM3 driver in front of the left-hand side of the Defendant freight vehicle at the victim G (48 years old) driving, who continued to proceed thereafter, received the front driver in front of the Defendant’s freight.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, etc. which require approximately 12 weeks of treatment to the victim I (year 56) who was on board a car, for approximately 6 weeks of treatment to the victim E, and for approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victim E, such as copic scopic scopic scopic scopic s

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement E and C;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Evidence and photographs of the scene of the traffic accident, and the application of the statutes on the actual survey report;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. In light of the circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's negligence was considerably high as a result of the central crime of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act with the suspension of execution, and the occurrence of many victims and the degree of damage, the nature of the crime and the circumstances of the defendant cannot be deemed to be light, but all of the crimes are recognized by the defendant, and the vehicle was covered by the automobile comprehensive insurance with some victims, and the defendant also.