공제금 등 청구의 소
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 11,615,273 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 14,115,273 to Plaintiff B; and (c) to each of them, from June 27, 2018 to April 2019.
1. Basic facts
A. Nonparty D is the real estate agent of the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, Nonparty F is the real estate agent of the G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, and Nonparty H is the real estate agent of the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office.
In order to guarantee liability for damages of practicing licensed real estate agents pursuant to Article 42 of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act, the Defendant entered into a mutual aid agreement with Nonparty D with the content that, for one year from April 6, 2013, the deduction amount shall be KRW 100,000,000, and the deduction period shall be KRW 100,000,000, and the period shall be one year from January 28, 2013, the deduction amount shall be KRW 100,000,000, and the deduction period shall be one year from February 8, 2015, and the period shall be one year from February 8, 2015, the Defendant shall be liable for damages to the parties to the transaction (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreement”).
B. On October 28, 2013, Plaintiff A’s lease agreement was concluded between Plaintiff A and Nonparty J on October 28, 2013, with D and F’s brokerage, Lho Lake (hereinafter “instant building”) among the multi-family houses located in Suwon-gu K in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and its site is “the instant land”; and L among the instant buildings is “instant L”.
(1) As to the instant L lease agreement, the term of KRW 50,000,000, and the term of November 2, 2013 to November 1, 2015 (hereinafter “instant L lease agreement”).
(2) On November 2, 2013, following the conclusion of the lease deposit, the transfer-in report on November 5, 2013 and the fixed date was obtained on November 1, 2013. 2) At the time of entering into the instant LA lease agreement, D and F, and the confirmation statement of the object of brokerage prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff A, the confirmation statement on the object of brokerage set up by the Plaintiff seems to be erroneous in writing regarding the instant land and buildings. The amount of KRW 1,040,000 (if written in the amount of KRW 104,00,000,000 is deemed to be written in error) is set up, and the amount of KRW 80,000,000 for the first priority tenant as “the rights of the object that has not been actually related or publicly notified.”