beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.02.02 2016나5922

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following amounts are subject to an additional payment order:

Reasons

Basic Facts

The defendant was finally confirmed as a decision of recommending reconciliation in the first instance co-defendant B.

Around 03:30 on May 7, 2014, the Plaintiff and Sivited with the Defendant on the road of “G” located in the Daejeon Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, on the ground that the Plaintiff and Sivited with the Defendant, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, i.e., the frame of the part of the essential body of which detailed treatment is required for about nine weeks, such as the mouth of the part of the body part of the Plaintiff’s face and body body, and the open body of the body around the snow.

The defendant is above A.

The crime of this paragraph was prosecuted as a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and became final and conclusive.

The defendant and the co-defendant B of the first instance court deposited KRW 5,00,000,00 for each of the damages against the plaintiff in the Daejeon District Court, Daejeon District Court No. 2014 High Court No. 3269, Jan. 15, 2015, as the damages for the plaintiff, and the plaintiff paid the amount of KRW 10,00,000 on January 15, 2015.

The designated parties D and E are the parents of the Plaintiff.

[Ground of the court below's determination] A's evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings, the occurrence of liability for damages, and the scope of the plaintiff's assertion and joint tort between the defendant and B, the plaintiff is liable to pay damages equivalent to KRW 3,268,539 of daily income, KRW 5,240,040 of medical treatment expenses ( KRW 3,620,000 of medical treatment expenses) in the future, KRW 4,100,000 of consolation money, KRW 5,000 of consolation money, KRW 5,000,000 of consolation money, and KRW 2,00,000 of consolation money, and KRW 5,00,000 of consolation money, respectively, in collaboration with the defendant Eul.

According to the above facts, the defendant is liable for damages caused by the harmful act of this case to the plaintiff, the designated person D, and E as joint tortfeasor.

The following facts are the scope of liability for damages and the evidence Nos. 5 through 7 as mentioned above.