소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the court’s explanation of this case are as follows: “Z” of the first instance judgment in the fourth and fourth instances shall be “V”; “AC” of the same eight parallels and ten parallels shall be deemed “AJ”; and “AC” of the seventh eight parallels shall be deemed “AJ”; and the grounds for the judgment of the first instance shall be as stated, except for the addition of the following:
- The additional part of the Plaintiff’s assertion as follows: (a) it is insufficient to recognize the fact that at the time AB purchased 2/35 shares of the instant land from AE, the co-owners specified the location and size as alleged by the Plaintiff at the time when AB purchased 2/35 shares of the instant land from AE, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, the said assertion is without merit. The instant land is divided into nine times, and is divided into four times and divided into four times, and five times and five times and more are located be located be below the part of the ditch. (b) AB purchased 2/35 shares of the instant land from AE on December 1, 1969, and then, at the time of AB purchasing 2/35 shares of the instant land from AE, it should be presumed that AE owned 5 times and five times the entire portion of the instant land under its own divided ownership. However, the Plaintiff’s divided ownership should be presumed to be one of the above AE’s entire portion of the instant land.
2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just as it is concluded, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.