When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B automobiles.

On August 2, 2017, the Defendant driven the above-mentioned vehicle around 10:00, and proceeded bypassing the two-lanes in front of the middle school located in the middle school located in the middle school from the middle school located in the middle school located in the Jungdong-gu Daejeon Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

On the other hand, there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, it is necessary to confirm whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right on the front side of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and followed the left hand part of the victim C (47 cc, n.e., the kn.s.) who dried the crosswalk on the left side of the road in the direction of the road of the defendant's walked by his negligence to the right side of the defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in a shoulder pipe that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. An investigation report on the actual traffic accident, and on-site photographs of the traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Provisional Payment Order, which is bypassing the reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, and inflicted an injury on pedestrians, is not provided against the degree of violation of the duty of care. However, the degree of damage is minor, the victim and the victim have no record of crime, and the sentencing data recorded in the record, such as the background of