On July 28, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 60km per hour from the erode of the erode of the erode to the windowpande of the erode 247-2 at the Changyang-gun, the front road of the materials warehouse located in the erode 247-2 in the Changyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed and to accurately manipulate steering devices, brakes, etc. to prevent accidents. In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, while the defendant neglected to do so and tried to damage the victim, the part of the body part of the victim C was placed on the right part of the front-hand part of the car of the victim C.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence during about 14 weeks of medical treatment.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2). According to the records, it is apparent that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant in submitting a written agreement on November 21, 2013, which was after the institution of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the above facts charged constitute a case in which the victim expressed his/her wish not to prosecute a case which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent, and thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.