For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted Defendants on the charge (excluding Defendant A and B’s guilty part) on the ground that there was no proof of crime.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above determination by the court below is justifiable.

In doing so, the court below did not err by misapprehending the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal principles, or by violating the principle of court-oriented trial and the principle of direct deliberation without exhausting all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but there is no evidence of objection against the guilty part in the final appeal and the reasons for the final appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.