교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B with low investment.
On October 29, 2015, the Defendant operated the above car around 18:25, and was driving for a U-turn in the direction of the 1st century, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong
In that sense, due to negligence in violation of the safety driving duty while neglecting the front day of the vehicle, the body of the victim was taken by the victim C ( South, 43 years old) who was walking along the crosswalk without any signal, etc. installed in the front right part of the vehicle, and the body of the victim was over with the front right part of the vehicle.
Due to the shock, the victim suffered injury, such as the balone-day therapy, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. C’s statement;
1. A survey report on actual conditions;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no basic area (four months to ten months) (the person subject to special sentencing] of the type 1 of general traffic accident [the decision of sentence] [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence]] favorable circumstances: primary crime, comprehensive insurance policy – unfavorable circumstances: the defendant was at fault, the damage of the victim was serious, the damage of the victim was serious, and the victim did not agree with the victim;