A. On May 1, 2007, the Plaintiff and C have two minor children under the law and under the slicker, who completed the marriage report.

B. The Defendant came to know of golf meetings with C and from July 2018, which came to be a meal, and eventually became a space between golf and sexual intercourse.

C. On May 17, 2019, the Plaintiff confirmed the Defendant and C’s non-wheeled fact by a vehicle box image of C, and found the Defendant’s office around 06:27.

The Defendant, upon the Plaintiff’s request, promised not to communicate with C in any way, such as in Mana or currency, text, SNS. In the event of a route, the Defendant drafted a letter stating that “5 million won per credit or per call shall be paid to C’s husband (Plaintiff)” (hereinafter “each letter of this case”).

Although the Defendant prepared the instant written statement, on May 17, 2019, the Defendant called C on the day, and the Defendant’s spouse contacted C with the Defendant’s telephone period.

On May 18, 2019, the Plaintiff found the Defendant’s house and asked C to contact with the phone at least 10 times prior to the instant report in violation of each of the instant reports. On May 30, 2019, the Plaintiff sent the Defendant’s file of evidence to the Defendant’s wife.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 9, each entry and video of Eul evidence 1 through 4, and purport of whole pleadings]

2. Determination on the claim of consolation money

A. 1) In principle, a third party’s act of infringing on a couple’s communal life falling under the essence of marriage or interfering with the maintenance thereof and infringing on a spouse’s right as a spouse by committing an unlawful act with the spouse, thereby infringing on the spouse’s right, constitutes tort. 2) According to the above acknowledged facts, the Defendant committed an unlawful act, such as having a sexual relationship with C with C, even though he knows that the spouse has a spouse, thereby infringing on or hindering the spouse’s communal life.