2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The gist of the assertion was that the Plaintiff: (a) around August 2014, to December 12, 2014; and (b) around February 2, 2015, at the Defendant’s request, owned B and C painting located in the Si-si; and (c) on February 2, 2015, the Plaintiff claimed against the Defendant for the payment of the construction cost of the unpaid construction cost of B and C painting located in the Si-si; (b) KRW 2 million for the unpaid construction cost of the livestock cooperative building located in the Si-si; and (c) KRW 6.2 million for the unpaid construction cost of the livestock cooperative building located in the Si-si; and (d) damages for delay.

B. On the basis of the judgment, the evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff was in accordance with the Defendant’s request or the construction contract with the Defendant, which was located at the racing city B, C painting construction, and the livestock cooperative building building building building building D in the racing city.

It is not sufficient to recognize that the unpaid construction cost for B/C seal construction located in the racing city is KRW 4.2 million, and that the unpaid construction cost for the new seal construction of the livestock industry cooperative located in Sejong-si is KRW 2,00,000,000, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.