개인정보보호법위반등
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of punishment) that the court below sentenced to the Defendants (e.g., one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The defendants recognized all of the crimes of this case and against the defendants, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime. However, in full view of various circumstances, including the personal information provided by the defendants, 788 personal information provided by the defendants, and 1,758 private documents forged and used for the opening of the Daepo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-Spo-S-S-S-S-S-S.
3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there are no grounds for appeal by the defendants. It is so decided as per Disposition.