공사대금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the defendant added "2. Additional Judgment" as to the assertion that the defendant emphasizes or adds to this court, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the column of 1, 2, and 3 of the reasoning of the judgment, except for the addition or modification as follows. Thus, this is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420
In the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, "No. 1 through 7, and No. 9" was changed to "No. 1 (the entire document is presumed to have been authentic due to the lack of dispute on the part of the defendant's seal image)" and "No. 2 through 7, 9, and 11" was changed to "No. 7 witness A" and "No. 18-19" was changed to "No. 20 of the same five pages "No. 20" and "No. 18-19" were changed to "No. 5 of the construction contract at the time of the alteration to "No. 7 of the construction contract at the time of the alteration to "No. 7 of the construction contract at the time of the alteration to "No. 5 of the construction contract at the time of the alteration to "No. 7 of the construction contract at the time of the alteration to "the construction contract at the time of the alteration to the contract at the time of the alteration to "the construction contract at the time of the alteration".
2. Additional determination
A. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion is that the Plaintiff arbitrarily revised the type “MRL” of the elevator type of the instant construction contract to “Gu MRL,” and the Defendant established an old type of product different from the subject matter of the instant construction contract.