In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

Defendant

A (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) was established on December 1, 1993 for the purpose of manufacturing and selling automobile parts under the trade name “Co., Ltd. E”. A (hereinafter “Defendant Company”). On January 1, 2009, the company continues to exist as of January 1, 2009 by changing its trade name to “Co., Ltd. A” (hereinafter “Co.”), and F is a person who enters the Defendant Company around January 1994 and works as a business director from January 2007, and supplies the vehicle and bridge system manufactured by the Defendant Company to Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”).

Although the R&A system of vehicles to be purchased by modern and Arabic vehicles supplied most of the quantities to the Defendant Company and G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), the Defendant Company suffered difficulties such as gradually lowering share and profitability in the process of competition with G.

On August 208, 2008, Habman decided the successful bidder by mutual agreement between Habman and Habman in order to prevent competition between Habman Company and Habman Company, Habman decided the successful bidder by mutual agreement between Habman in order to prevent competition between Habman Company and Habman Company. In response, Habman agreed to adjust the result of the successful bidder by deciding the bid price of G based on the bid price of the Defendant Company and the bid price of Habar system from that time.

No business operator shall agree with other business operators to jointly restrict competition by determining successful bidders or bidding price in bidding or auction, etc.

Nevertheless, F, who is a business director of the defendant company, shall:

1. On January 9, 2009