도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, two years of probation, community service order, 80 hours of community service order, and 40 hours of order to attend a compliance driving lecture) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant made a confession of the crime, and although the defendant has no criminal record, the defendant was sentenced four times to a fine due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act due to a drunk driving, etc., the defendant was sentenced to a fine on April 9, 2009. The defendant again committed the crime of non-licensed driving in this case even though he was sentenced to two years a suspended sentence due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. The defendant had a serious attitude at the time of the defendant's law. The defendant seems to have a high risk of recidivism due to the characteristics of the defendant's external duties.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.