A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 700,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. The thief Defendants discovered and carried out the document bags containing 73 copies of the receipt certificate of subscription owned by the victim E at the seat of the victim E at the seat of Gangnam-gu Seoul around June 14, 2017.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to steal the victim's property.

2. The Defendants conspired to receive money by using a stolen acceptance of subscription as stated in paragraph 1.

On June 14, 2017, at the “G” restaurant located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on June 14, 2017, the Defendants received the above receipt on behalf of the victim and manage without permission the victim’s personal information, such as resident numbers, etc.

If we do not know 2 million won as a honorarium, we will report it to the viewing.

“A person who wishes to deliver a horse to the victim and deliver 2 million won from the person who was frightened by the frighten, but the victim did not respond to the request and attempted to report 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first public trial protocol

1. Statement of the witness E and H in the second public trial records;

1. Each statement made by the witness I, J and K in the third public trial records;

1. Investigation report (verification of CCTV images of suspects);

1. Recording records of the submission of victims;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (an extractment of text and language details between a witness H and a suspect B);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Articles 329, 30 (U.S.) of the Criminal Act, Articles 352, 350 (1), and 30 (U.S.) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendants’ participation in the instant crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.